[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609041239390.17115@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:41:58 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, akpm@...l.org, viro@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22][RFC] Unionfs: Copyup Functionality
>> Is BUG the right thing, what do others think? (Using WARN, and set err to
>> something useful?)
>
>Well, it is definitely a condition which Unionfs doesn't expect - if it
>doesn't know about the type, how could it copy it up?
Other filesystems don't seem to BUG either (at least I have not run into
that yet) when - for whatever reasons - the statdata of a dentry is
fubared. `ls` just displays it then, like
?-w---Sr-T 1 root root 4294967295 date fubared_file
Jan Engelhardt
--
--
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists