[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44FD7DAE.7030705@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:37:50 -0400
From: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
To: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org>
CC: bjorn.helgaas@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>,
greg@...ah.com, jeff@...zik.org, harmon@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VIA IRQ quirk fixup only in XT_PIC mode Take 2
Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 12:13 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
>>> about Linus suggestion :
>>> - new_irq = dev->irq & 0xf;
>>> + new_irq = dev->irq;
>>> + if (!new_irq || new_irq >= 15)
>>> + return;
>>>
>>> no, we have problem with VIA SATA controllers which have irq lower than
>>> 15
>> Any chance you can provide a link to this example so that we can
>> document the decision in the commit message?
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/30/59
I'm confused. Heikki's report is about a sata_sil controller and he
didn't include any dmesg output so I don't know how you can conclude
that quirking an IRQ to something less than 15 was the fix...
Also note that the fix was *not* quirking the device at all (your patch
ensured that the quirks didn't run because IO-APIC was enabled), this
hardly seems like an accurate way of arguing that quirks that change the
IRQ to something less than 15 are *required*...
Daniel
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists