[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1157468155.30252.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:55:55 +0100
From: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
bjorn.helgaas@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, greg@...ah.com,
harmon@....edu, Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: VIA IRQ quirk, another (embarrassing) suggestion.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 11:33 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:54:07PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>
> > I don't know if this is a real question. Have we VIA products on PCI
> > card, running on not VIA chip sets ?
>
> Yes. Certainly for on-board devices too.
OK , other argument.
We have billions of VIA chip sets with VIA PCI on-board and
VIA PCI on others chip sets, if exists, are a very few.
So, because some exceptions, we shouldn't stop a resolution of a very
large % of the cases.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists