linux-kernel - Re: VIA IRQ quirk, another (embarrassing) suggestion.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44FD9431.2050403@garzik.org>
Date:	Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:13:53 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org>
CC:	Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	bjorn.helgaas@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, greg@...ah.com,
	harmon@....edu, Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: VIA IRQ quirk, another (embarrassing) suggestion.

Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 11:33 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:54:07PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know if this is a real question. Have we VIA products on PCI
>>> card, running on not VIA chip sets ?
>> Yes.  Certainly for on-board devices too.
> 
> OK , other argument.
> We have billions of VIA chip sets with VIA PCI on-board and 
> VIA PCI on others chip sets, if exists, are a very few.
> So, because some exceptions, we shouldn't stop a resolution of a very
> large % of the cases. 

No thanks.  As VIA SATA maintainer, I like being able to use my VIA SATA 
PCI card.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/