linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/16] GFS2: The DLM interface module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:35:22 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
cc:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell Cattelan <cattelan@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] GFS2: The DLM interface module

Hi David,


>> >+int gdlm_get_lock(lm_lockspace_t *lockspace, struct lm_lockname *name,
>> >+		  lm_lock_t **lockp)
>>
>> [lm_lock_t is]
>> currently typedef'ed to void [...]. (One _could_
>> get rid of it, but better not while it is called lm_lock_t. Leave as-is
>> for now.)
>
>I'm wondering what you might suggest instead of using the lm_lockspace_t,
>lm_lock_t, lm_fsdata_t typedefs.  These are opaque objects passed between
>gfs and the lock modules.  Could you give an example or point to some code
>that shows what you're thinking?

What I was thinking about:
int gdlm_get_lock(void *lockspace, struct lm_lockname *name, void **lockp)


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/