[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1157707578.11901.13.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:26:18 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] GFS2: The DLM interface module
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 18:35 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> >> >+int gdlm_get_lock(lm_lockspace_t *lockspace, struct lm_lockname *name,
> >> >+ lm_lock_t **lockp)
> >>
> >> [lm_lock_t is]
> >> currently typedef'ed to void [...]. (One _could_
> >> get rid of it, but better not while it is called lm_lock_t. Leave as-is
> >> for now.)
> >
> >I'm wondering what you might suggest instead of using the lm_lockspace_t,
> >lm_lock_t, lm_fsdata_t typedefs. These are opaque objects passed between
> >gfs and the lock modules. Could you give an example or point to some code
> >that shows what you're thinking?
>
> What I was thinking about:
> int gdlm_get_lock(void *lockspace, struct lm_lockname *name, void **lockp)
>
>
> Jan Engelhardt
I've had a bash at this and the results are here:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/steve/gfs2-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b47c11d1cbedcba685c9bd90c73fd41acdfab0e
Let me know if thats ok,
Steve.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists