lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 09:56:18 +0200 From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH libata-dev#upstream-fixes] libata: ignore CFA signature while sanity-checking an ATAPI device Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: >> You mean 2.6.18, yes? > > Actually, it looks like it should indeed be 2.6.19 (libata #upstream), > not 2.6.18 (libata #upstream-fixes). Alan's "add compactflash support" > patch isn't in 2.6.18-rc. > > So, this should -not- be sent for 2.6.18. Hello, Yes, I meant .18. Jeff, this should be fixed before 2.6.18 is released. It's not the question of whether CFA support is implemented or not. We're sanity-checking in 2.6.18-rcX anyway and it's the sanity checking which is causing problem. What seems to have happened is... 1. CFA support is implemented 2. CFA check was added (backported) to upstream-fixes, but it was incorrect. So, we need to do one of two things. * apply this patch to 2.6.18-rcX * remove ata_id_is_cfa() check altogether -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists