[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10720.1157711152@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 11:25:52 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FRV: do_gettimeofday() should no longer use tickadj
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> No, you do a chain handler. Look at how I do it in
> arch/powerpc/platform/pseries/setup.c for example. It's actually
> trivial. You install a special flow handler (which means that there is
> very little overhead, almost none, from the toplevel irq to the chained
> irq). You can _also_ if you want just install an IRQ handler for the
> cascaded controller and call generic_handle_irq (rather than __do_IRQ)
> from it, but that has more overhead. A chained handler completely
> relaces the flow handler for the cascade, and thus, if you don't need
> all of the nits and bits of the other flow handlers for your cascade,
> you can speed things up by hooking at that level.
Please update Documentation/DocBook/genericirq.tmpl. That doesn't mention it.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists