linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1157891081.23085.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:24:41 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2

Ar Sul, 2006-09-10 am 12:20 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse:
> But I don't think it's realistic to suggest that C libraries should be
> built without access to our asm/term{bit,io}s.h at all. However, I'm
> only really responsible for the new export _mechanism_ -- I'm not going
> to impose policy except when people like Andi do stupid things and
> sneakily send private patches to undo fixes I've already made.

glibc needs them, nobody else does.

The point I was trying to make is that user space (except glibc) does
not use them. glibc presents a different struct termios to them already,
and it always includes c_ispeed/c_ospeed.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/