[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158268113.17467.38.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:08:32 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 22:54 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > those are technical arguments - i'm not sure how you can understand them
> > to be "personal preferences". The only personal preference i have is
> > that in the end a technically most superior solution should be merged.
>
> Ingo, so far you have made not a single argument why they can't coexist
> except for your personal dislike.
Not to put to fine a point on it, but I think there's not a small number
of us that "prefer" the best solution.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists