[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609142324181.6761@scrub.home>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:30:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Ingo, so far you have made not a single argument why they can't coexist
> > except for your personal dislike.
>
> Not to put to fine a point on it, but I think there's not a small number
> of us that "prefer" the best solution.
You can have it.
OTOH I would also like to know what's going in my m68k kernel without
having to implement some rather complex infrastructure, which I don't need
otherwise. There hasn't been a single argument so far, why we can't have
both.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists