[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158331277.29932.66.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:41:17 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Ar Gwe, 2006-09-15 am 15:34 +0200, ysgrifennodd Roman Zippel:
> > Maintainability ? common good over individual weirdnesses ? Ability for
> > people to concentrate on getting one good set of interfaces not twelve
> > bad ones ? Consistency for user space ?
>
> Alan, you're making things up without any proof.
Welcome to my killfile. There isn't much point having a discussion with
anyone who considers any view or fact not in agreement as "no proof" and
any view or fact that favours them as "proven".
In the meantime perhaps the saner members of the static trace brigade
can explain why gcc debug data isn't good enough for them when its good
enough for kgdb to do single stepping at source level and variable
printing ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists