[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200609151316_MC3-1-CB57-4BE@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:14:47 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev <ltt-dev@...fik.org>,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure)
0.5.108
In-Reply-To: <1158331071.29932.63.camel@...alhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:37:51 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > $ grep KPROBES arch/*/Kconf*
> > arch/i386/Kconfig:config KPROBES
> > arch/ia64/Kconfig:config KPROBES
> > arch/powerpc/Kconfig:config KPROBES
> > arch/sparc64/Kconfig:config KPROBES
> > arch/x86_64/Kconfig:config KPROBES
>
> Send patches. The fact nobody has them implemented on your platform
> isn't a reason to implement something else, quite the reverse in fact.
Yes, but the point is: until that's done you can't claim kprobes is a
valid tracing tool for everyone.
And things like net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c shouldn't be generally implemented
until every arch is supported.
--
Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists