[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <057a01c6d8ec$4d52c7b0$294b82ce@stuartm>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:28:04 -0400
From: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@...necttech.com>
To: "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: TCP stack behaviour question
I'm having some trouble with a network application I've written. I've
done a lot of research the last few days; man 7 ip, man 7 tcp, kernel
2.4.31 source code, Stevens' Illustrated TCP/IP Vol 1 & 3 (for some
reason we don't have Vol 2), Usenet, websites. I'm hoping someone here
can help me out, or point me in the correct direction.
Distro: Debian 3.0 r2
Kernel: Stock 2.4.24
tcp_retries1 == 3
tcp_retries2 == 15
I have an application that setups up a TCP connection to a server. If
the server has a power failure, TCP starts retransmitting the packet
that wasn't ACKed. I see the exponential backoff.
Question 1: There's the original packet, plus 7 retransmitted packets
for a total of 8, then TCP gives up. How is 7 (or 8) derived from the
tcp_retries[12] settings?
Question 1a: The time between last and second-last retransmit packets
is only about 27 seconds. I've read there's a maximum time, but also
that it's usually 100 or 120 seconds. Where can I find that setting in
/proc?
Question 1b: If RTO is that high, why is retransmit stopping?
Question 2: After the retransmit has given up, the app is still
making an occasional write(), which succeeds! However, tearing down
and attemting a new connection results in an immediate EHOSTUNREACH
error. Why is the write() succeeding?
Question 2a: How can my app find out the EHOSTUNREACH error
immediately? IP_RECVERR is not implemented on TCP, and SO_ERROR always
reports no error (0).
..Stu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists