[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060915181907.GB17581@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:19:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, karim@...rsys.com,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> What Karim is sharing with us here (yet again) is the real in-field
> experience of real users (ie: not kernel developers).
well, Jes has that experience and Thomas too.
> I mean, on one hand we have people explaining what they think a
> tracing facility should and shouldn't do, and on the other hand we
> have a guy who has been maintaining and shipping exactly that thing to
> (paying!) customers for many years.
so does Thomas and Jes. So what's the point?
i judge LTT by its current code quality, not by its proponents shouting
volume - and that quality is still quite poor at the moment. (and then
there are the conceptual problems too, outlined numerous times) I have
quoted specific example(s) for that in this thread. Furthermore, LTT
does this:
246 files changed, 26207 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
and this gives me the shivers, for all the reasons i outlined.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists