[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609152227080.6761@scrub.home>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:35:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, karim@...rsys.com,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Who is going to implement this for every arch?
> > Is this now the official party line that only archs, which implement all
> > of this, can make use of efficient tracing?
>
> In the reverse you are enforcing an ugly - but available for all archs -
> solution due to the fact that there is nobody interested enough to
> implement it ?
Where is the proof that such solution is inherently ugly? (Note that
just picking some example from LTT doesn't make a general proof.)
I am also not the one who wants to enforce a single solution onto
everyone.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists