lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:40:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> cc: karim@...rsys.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org, Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 Hi, On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > So this has to be changed. And requiring to recompile the kernel is the > wrong answer. Having some nifty tool, which allows you to define the set > of dynamic trace points or use a predefined one is the way to go. Nobody is taking dynamic tracing away! You make it sound that tracing is only possible via dynamic traces. If I want to use static tracepoints, why shouldn't I? > Stop whining! So we're back to personal attacks now. :-( bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists