[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450A6B06.1050308@sw.ru>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:57:42 +0400
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To: sekharan@...ibm.com
CC: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>, balbir@...ibm.com,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Srivatsa <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...l.ru>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user
memory)
> CKRM/RG handles it this way:
>
> Amount of a resource a child RG gets is the ratio of its share value to
> the parent's total # of shares. Children's resource allocation can be
> changed just by changing the parent's total # of shares.
>
> If you case about initial situation would be:
> Total memory in the system 100MB
> parent's total # of shares: 100 (1 share == 1MB)
> 10 children with # of shares: 10 (i.e each children has 10MB)
>
> When I want to add another child, just change parent's total # of shares
> to be say 125:
> Total memory in the system 100MB
> parent's total # of shares: 125 (1 share == 0.8MB)
> 10 children with # of shares: 10 (i.e each children has 8MB)
> Now you are left with 25 shares (or 20MB) that you can assign to new
> child(ren) as you please.
setting memory in "shares" doesn't look user friendly at all...
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists