[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450A71B1.8020009@sw.ru>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:26:09 +0400
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To: sekharan@...ibm.com
CC: rohitseth@...gle.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
vatsa@...ibm.com, CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
balbir@...ibm.com, Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@...ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...l.ru>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user
memory)
Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> esoteric ?! Please look at the different operating system that provide
> resource management and other resource management capability providers.
> All of them have both guarantees and limits (they might call them
> differently).
>
> Here are a few:
> http://www.hp.com/go/prm
> http://www.sun.com/software/resourcemgr/
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245977.pdf
> http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vmware_drs_wp.pdf
> http://www.aurema.com
have you ever tested any of these?!
there is no _memory_ guarantees AFAIK in all of them except
for VMware which can reserve required amount of RAM for VM.
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists