[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1158495321.4691.64.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:15:21 +0000
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: karim@...rsys.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>, fche@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 21:59 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It's hardly rocket science - it appears that nobody has ever bothered.
>
> Hmm, that's one explanation. The other explanation, which in my view is
> the likelier -- but I've been shown wrong before, is that most of those
> who went through that code before just didn't have Ingo's insight and
> abilities. Which goes to show what can be achieved when "interesting"
> ideas are given a hand by those having appropriate insight and
> abilities -- and, of course, what fate awaits those other ideas which
> are less so fortunate in the eyes of the talented. Praise the lord for
> the chosen ones.
(that bit after the last -- is a steaming pile of nastiness)
I don't understand your reaction. If roles were reversed, would you not
examine the implementation?
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists