[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060918190033.GD17670@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:00:33 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexis Bruemmer <alexisb@...ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] libsas: move ATA bits into a separate module
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 03:40:55PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > I disagree completely with this approach.
> >
> > You don't need a table of hooks for the case where libata is disabled in
> > .config. Thus, it's only useful for the case where libsas is loaded as
> > a module, but libata is not.
>
> Indeed, I misunderstood what James Bottomley wanted, so I reworked the
> patch. It has the same functionality as before, but this module uses
> the module loader/symbol resolver for all the functions in libata, and
> allows libsas to (optionally) call into sas_ata with weak references by
> pushing a table of the necessary function pointers into libsas at
> sas_ata load time. Thus, libsas doesn't need to load libata/sas_ata
> unless it actually finds a SATA device.
NACK again. Week references are bad. Please change it back to normal
hard references so that it works like everything else in the kernel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists