[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <450EECEC.207@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:01:00 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
In Cognito <defend.the.world@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Sysenter crash with Nested Task Bit set
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Yes it's never fast, but on basically all non P4 CPUs it is still fast enough
> to not be a problem. I suppose it causes a trace cache flush or something like
> that there.
I don't think it's that bad, but it might cause a full pipeline flush.
I seem to remember measuring its cost at about 50 cycles.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists