linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/11] LTTng-core 0.5.111 : Relay+DebugFS (DebugFS fix)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:04:00 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>
Cc:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>, ltt-dev@...fik.org,
	Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@...ymtl.ca>,
	Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@...s.ku.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/11] LTTng-core 0.5.111 : Relay+DebugFS (DebugFS fix)

On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 09:21:15PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> 
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > 1 - DebugFS stalled dentry patch
> 
> I think it would be best if patches posted were in the body of
> the email instead of as attachments. It makes it easier to
> review and comment.

Also the subject line is utterly useless.  Please take a look at
Documentation/SubmittingPatches for the general format of a patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Karim
> -- 
> President  / Opersys Inc.
> Embedded Linux Training and Expertise
> www.opersys.com  /  1.866.677.4546
---end quoted text---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/