[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060919080324.601e50f9.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:03:24 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Alter get_order() so that it can make use of
ilog2() on a constant [try #3]
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:08:17 +0100
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> > I didn't pursue it further, because sprinkling ARCH_HAS_FOO things into
> > bitops.h(!) is all rather hacky. Better to use CONFIG_* so they're always
> > visible and one knows where to go to find things.
>
> But (1) they're not config options,
Well they are, really. "This architecture has its own get_order()". It's
not *user* configurable, but neither is, say CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS.
The problem we have with the ARCH_HAS_FOO things is that there's never been
an include/asm/arch_has_foo.h in which to define them, so stuff gets
sprinkled all over the place.
> and (2) there's plenty of precedent for
> this sort of thing (ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH for example).
There's precedent both ways. The advantages of doing it in config are
a) You know where to go to find it: arch/foo/Kconfig
b) It's always available, due to forced inclusion of config.h.
(I think I actually would prefer include/asm/arch_has_foo.h if we had it,
because it's lighter-weight. But we don't)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists