[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609191538.k8JFc6cY022534@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:38:06 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: rohitseth@...gle.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch03/05]- Containers: Initialization and Configfs interface
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:41:26 PDT, Rohit Seth said:
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc6-mm2.org/kernel/container_configfs.c 1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc6-mm2.ctn/kernel/container_configfs.c 2006-09-14 16:18:45.000000000 -0700
> +static ssize_t simple_containerfs_attr_show(struct config_item *item,
> + struct configfs_attribute *attr,
> + char *page)
...
> + switch (ctfs_attr->idx) {
> + case CONFIGFS_CTN_ATTR_ID:
> + tmp = sc->ctn.id;
> + break;
...
> + return sprintf(page, "%ld\n", tmp);
What use is this value, given that we already have containers/user_friendly_name
to use in the filesystem namespace? Or is this a mostly-debugging thing?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists