[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060920084638.900c9a69.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:46:38 -0700
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bjorn_helgaas@...com, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] do_no_pfn()
On 20 Sep 2006 03:25:25 -0400 Jes Sorensen wrote:
> include/linux/mm.h | 7 +++++
> mm/memory.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -625,6 +626,12 @@ static inline int page_mapped(struct pag
> #define NOPAGE_OOM ((struct page *) (-1))
>
> /*
> + * Error return values for the *_nopfn functions
> + */
> +#define NOPFN_SIGBUS ((unsigned long) -1)
> +#define NOPFN_OOM ((unsigned long) -2)
Is there any difference in the above and
#define NOPFN_SIGBUS -1UL
#define NOPFN_OOM -2UL
?
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists