| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1158830206.11109.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:16:46 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans > If you think that shortening the release cycle will cause people to be more > disciplined in their changes, to spend less time going berzerk and to spend > more time working with our users and testers on known bugs then I'm all > ears. A suggestion from the department of evil ideas: Call even cycles development odd ones stabilizing. Nothing gets into an odd one without a review and linux-kernel signoff/ack ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists