| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609211217190.6761@scrub.home> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:24:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans (NTP changes) Hi, On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, john stultz wrote: > No objections here, but I wanted to put forth some caution as I've seen > some odd NTP behavior with the full NTP patchset on my laptop (either it > does not converge or it just converges *much* more slowly then without). > Unfortunately I've not been able to collect solid enough data to analyze > the issue (really, each run should go for atleast a full day and always > run on the same network). grumble... As I said before it's expected that the initial covergence is slower and I need the data over multiple days to really say something about it. There has been really a lot of time for doing this... bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists