| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609211254400.16661@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:55:14 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org> Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans >> If you think that shortening the release cycle will cause people to be more >> disciplined in their changes, to spend less time going berzerk and to spend >> more time working with our users and testers on known bugs then I'm all >> ears. > >A suggestion from the department of evil ideas: Call even cycles >development odd ones stabilizing. Nothing gets into an odd one without a >review and linux-kernel signoff/ack ? Why, just open 2.7.0. Harhar! Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists