linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.1[78] page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060923.130322.78711694.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, Holger.Kiehl@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	john.ronciak@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.1[78] page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20

From: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:50:34 -0700

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It's still there, isn't it?
> > 
> > For the 9k MTU case, for example, we end up allocating 16384 byte skbs
> > instead of 32786 kbytes ones.
> 
> yes, the only thing I'm doing is accounting for the 2 bytes one steap earlier. 

Ok, I'm fine with this patch unless it causes some regression that hasn't
been discovered yet :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/