[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609230239.57694.ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:39:57 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, akpm@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: More thoughts on getting rid of ZONE_DMA
On Saturday 23 September 2006 02:23, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > The problem is that if someone has a workload with lots of pinned pages
> > (e.g. lots of mlock) then the first 16MB might fill up completely and there
> > is no chance at all to free it because it's pinned
>
> Ok. That may be a problem for i386. After the removal of the GFP_DMA
> and ZONE_DMA stuff it is then be possible to redefine ZONE_DMA (or
> whatever we may call it ZONE_RESERVE?) to an arbitrary size a the
> beginning of memory. Then alloc_pages_range() can dynamically decide to
> tap that pool if necessary.
That's should work yes. Just we need the pool.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists