[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609231907360.16435@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, akpm@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: More thoughts on getting rid of ZONE_DMA
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The problem is that if someone has a workload with lots of pinned pages
> (e.g. lots of mlock) then the first 16MB might fill up completely and there
> is no chance at all to free it because it's pinned
Note that mlock'ed pages are movable. mlock only specifies that pages
must stay in memory. It does not say that they cannot be moved. So
page migration could help there.
This brings up a possible problem spot in the current kernel: It seems
that the VM is capable of migrating pages from ZONE_DMA to
ZONE_NORMAL! So once pages are in memory then they may move out of the
DMA-able area.
I assume the writeback paths have some means of detecting that a
page is out of range during writeback and then do page bouncing?
If that is the case then we could simply move movable pages out
if necessary. That would be a kind of bouncing logic there that
would only kick in if necessary.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists