linux-kernel - Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609250112.k8P1CTfZ019880@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:12:28 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
Cc:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:47:19 +0400, Stas Sergeev said:
> Hi.
> 
> Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > Definitely not.  The test should stay.  It does the right thing.  Yes,
> > some applications might break, but this is the fault of the application.
> But why exactly? They do:
> shm_open();
> mmap(PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC);
> and mmap fails.
> Where is the fault of an app here?

'man 2 open' reports the following error code as a possibility:
       EROFS  pathname refers to a file on a read-only filesystem and write
	access was requested.

Are you suggesting that it's not an app's fault/problem if it tries to
open a writable file on a R/O filesystem?  Because it's essentially the
same problem....


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped