[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060925165433.GA28898@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:54:33 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH 1/4] RCU: split classic rcu
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:01:41PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
>
> This patch re-organizes the RCU code to enable multiple implementations
> of RCU. Users of RCU continues to include rcupdate.h and the
> RCU interfaces remain the same. This is in preparation for
> subsequently merging the preepmtpible RCU implementation.
I still disagree very strongly. In a given tree there should be oneRCU
implementation for the traditional interface. We probably want srcu
in addition, but not things hiding behind the interface.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists