linux-kernel - Re: [-mm PATCH 1/4] RCU: split classic rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:54:33 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH 1/4] RCU: split classic rcu

On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:01:41PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> 
> This patch re-organizes the RCU code to enable multiple implementations
> of RCU. Users of RCU continues to include rcupdate.h and the
> RCU interfaces remain the same. This is in preparation for
> subsequently merging the preepmtpible RCU implementation.

I still disagree very strongly.  In a given tree there should be oneRCU
implementation for the traditional interface.  We probably want srcu
in addition, but not things hiding behind the interface.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/