linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans (NTP changes)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0609251004h288818c9k4f1c8684b956b72@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:04:57 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <madrabbit@...il.com>
To:	"john stultz" <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"Roman Zippel" <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans (NTP changes)

On 9/25/06, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> I was able to run tests for two days each w/ and w/o the patch I had
> concerns about. And indeed, it seems if the drift file is reset, the
> initial convergence is much slower (and this is really what worried me).
> However once it converges it seems to keep sync as well as the current
> code.

So slower convergence isn't a regression?

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/