[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200609251905.22224.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:05:21 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Aubrey <aubreylee@...il.com>
Cc: "Luke Yang" <luke.adi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
On Monday 25 September 2006 17:39, Aubrey wrote:
> 1) Timer interrupt will call do_irq(), then return_from_int().
>
> 2) return_from_int() will check if there is interrupt pending or
> signal pending, if so, it will call schedule_and_signal_from_int().
>
> 3) schedule_and_signal_from_int() will jump to resume_userspace()
>
> 4) resume_userspace() will call _schedule to run the user task.
I have a little trouble reading your assembly code, but your
return_from_int() function should normally not call
schedule_and_signal_from_int() when the interrupt happened
in kernel context (like in the idle function):
+ /* if not return to user mode, get out */
+ p2.l = lo(IPEND);
+ p2.h = hi(IPEND);
+ r0 = [p2];
+ r1 = 0x17(Z);
+ r2 = ~r1;
+ r2.h = 0;
+ r0 = r2 & r0;
+ r1 = 1;
+ r1 = r0 - r1;
+ r2 = r0 & r1;
+ cc = r2 == 0;
+ if !cc jump 2f;
This looks a lot like you user_mode() function, so you jump
over schedule_and_signal_from_int() here.
What you described would be a preemptive kernel
(CONFIG_PREEMPT), but you clearly don't have that enabled.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists