linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:49:54 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	jeremy@...p.org
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area.


> diff -r 1555a09108d1 include/asm-i386/pda.h
> --- a/include/asm-i386/pda.h	Sun Sep 24 19:18:35 2006 -0700
> +++ b/include/asm-i386/pda.h	Mon Sep 25 01:46:27 2006 -0700
> @@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
>  #ifndef _I386_PDA_H
>  #define _I386_PDA_H
>  
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>

If this is really 1/1 why does it patch a file called pda.h? 

I've thrown away the local pda patches before this because I assumed
you started fresh.

Somehow I'm not surprised that nothing applies.  You seem to always
start with some random tree that nobody else has.

Anyways, this patchkit has caused so much trouble and churn that I'll drop
it for now until after the .19 merge is done.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/