linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45184318.6060807@goop.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:59:04 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area.

Andi Kleen wrote:
> If this is really 1/1 why does it patch a file called pda.h? 
>
> I've thrown away the local pda patches before this because I assumed
> you started fresh.
>
> Somehow I'm not surprised that nothing applies.  You seem to always
> start with some random tree that nobody else has.
>   
Well, it's based on -mm, but I guess that includes pieces of your patch 
series.  I was a bit surprised to see pda.h still in -mm with the rest 
dropped.

> Anyways, this patchkit has caused so much trouble and churn that I'll drop
> it for now until after the .19 merge is done.
>   
I'll respin it against your patches later today.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/