linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609252305.10239.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:05:10 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Initialize the per-CPU data area.

On Monday 25 September 2006 22:59, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > If this is really 1/1 why does it patch a file called pda.h? 
> >
> > I've thrown away the local pda patches before this because I assumed
> > you started fresh.
> >
> > Somehow I'm not surprised that nothing applies.  You seem to always
> > start with some random tree that nobody else has.
> >   
> Well, it's based on -mm, but I guess that includes pieces of your patch 
> series.  I was a bit surprised to see pda.h still in -mm with the rest 
> dropped.

I see.  Andrew reverted some stuff to fix his PII (which I broke BTW
it wasn't a problem in your original patches) but he didn't revert everything
only starting from the bisected patch.

Ok on the next resync everything will be dropped there.
 
> > Anyways, this patchkit has caused so much trouble and churn that I'll drop
> > it for now until after the .19 merge is done.
> >   
> I'll respin it against your patches later today.

Thanks. It's not that urgent because the merge will need a few days
at least.

Also I must admit I haven't figured out yet if yours or Rusty's patchkit
is better. So far I was leaning towards yours, but that might be because
I haven't looked closely at Rusty's version.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/