linux-kernel - Re: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609270131.46686.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:31:46 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Stefan Seyfried <seife@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))

On Wednesday, 27 September 2006 01:05, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 00:31 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 07:38:31AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 22:35 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:14, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 12:45:00AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > >...
> > > > > > solid)
> > > > > > 	apart from HIGHMEM64G fiasco, and related agpgart fiasco long
> > > > > > 	time before that... these are driver problems...
> > > > > >...
> > > > > 
> > > > > One point that seems to be a bit forgotten is that driver problems do 
> > > > > actually matter a lot:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I for one do not care much whether I can abort suspending (I can always 
> > > > > resume) or whether dancing penguins are displayed during suspending - 
> > > > > but the fact that my saa7134 card only outputs the picture but no sound 
> > > > > after resuming from suspend-to-disk is a real show-stopper for me.
> > > 
> > > Agreed that some things are more important than others. But to some
> > > people, user interface does matter. After all, we want (well I want)
> > > people considering converting from Windows to see that free software can
> > > be better than proprietary stuff, not just imitate what they're doing. 
> > > 
> > > Suspend2 doesn't actually provide dancing penguins while suspending -
> > > it's a simple progress bar in either pure text or overlayed on an image
> > > of your choosing.
> > > 
> > > The support for aborting is really just fall out from the work on
> > > debugging and testing failure paths.
> > >...
> > 
> > Sorry if this sounded as if I was against improvements of suspend.
> > That was not my intention.
> > 
> > But as long as there are driver problems, suspend as a whole can not be 
> > called solid. The core itself might be solid or not, but without working 
> > drivers this doesn't buy users much.
> > 
> > A user might be impressed by a progress bar on a nifty image, but if one 
> > or more of his drivers have problems with suspend the user won't get a 
> > good impression of Linux.
> > 
> > How many driver problems with suspend are buried in emails and
> > Bugzillas (will problems like kernel Bugzilla #6035 ever be debugged?)?
> 
> I fully agree. One of the largest issues I'm regularly dealing with is
> people reporting problems with drivers.

Well, can we please have these reports forwarded to LKML or placed
in the bugzilla?

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
		R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/