linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200609280057.03372.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:57:03 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups

On Wednesday 27 September 2006 21:54, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the
> outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64.  This actually
> takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture
> dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture.
> 
> So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures
> will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble.
> 
> msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code.
> msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts
> msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code.
> msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64
> htirq: Tidy up the htirq code


The (small) x86-64 parts are fine by me. Thanks.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/