[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060927225815.GB7469@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:58:15 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Sergey Panov <sipan@...an.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 01:37:37PM -0500, Chase Venters wrote:
> I think one thing that should have happened a _lot_ sooner is that you and
> others should have made clear to the startled community that you object
> precisely to the anti-Tivoization clause, not because of any technical
> reason or interpretation but because you don't see anything wrong with
> Tivo's use of Linux. It would have been nice but totally optional to
> engage in dialogue with the FSF. But slandering them about their license
> development process, or their intentions with regard to using Linux as
> leverage, is counterproductive whether true or not.
This has been made clear to Eben and the FSF, for a long time. The
FSF has simply chosen not to listen to Linus and other members of the
kernel community. In fact, I've never seen any interest in a
dialogue, just a pseudo-dialogue where "input is solicited", and then
as near as far as I can tell, at least on the anti-Tivo issue, has
been simply ignored. But in any case, it should not have come as a
surprise and should not have startled anyone.
Regards,
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists