linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Illustration of warning explosion silliness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <451B52B0.1090801@garzik.org>
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:42:24 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Illustration of warning explosion silliness

Andrew Morton wrote:
>> You're ignoring the API issue at hand.  Let me say it again for the 
>> cheap seats:  "search"  You search a list, and stick a pointer somewhere 
>> when found.  No hardware touched.  No allocations.  Real world.  There 
>> is an example of usage in the kernel today.
> 
> If it's called in that fashion then the caller should still check the
> device_for_each_child() return value to find out if it actually got a
> match.


Or in the case of scsi_sysfs.c, it simply <does something>.

Oh well, whatever.  This thing introduces endless build noise we won't 
kill for years, making it much harder to spot much more serious stuff.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/