lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1159421223.13562.75.camel@sipan.sipan.org>
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:27:03 -0400
From:	Sergey Panov <sipan@...an.org>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Patrick McFarland <diablod3@...il.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...eleye.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement

On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 01:15 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Chase Venters wrote:
> > I sympathize with Richard on his avoidance of "open-source". I don't 
> > necessarily take the same view, but I understand that his big concern is that 
> > the message he feels is important will be lost. I also think some of the 
> > things I've heard from the "open-source" side are too extreme - take, for 
> > instance, ESR's idea that we don't need the GPL license at all. That sounds 
> > like a nice world he's living in, but I'm not sure we're all on the same 
> > planet yet.
> 
> ESR is a nutcase too.

 How did you manage to figure it out?

> > The final GPLv3 may indeed go too far for many open-source supporters. But 
> > then again, it is the FSF's license, and it should at least not surprise 
> > anyone if they are more concerned with the ideals of the license rather than 
> > current market realities. Market conditions change; ideals generally don't.
> 
> As long as you can admit that FSF is divorced from reality...

??? Ideals are always divorced from reality. But some shape it, and some
are irrelevant.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ