[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <451FE7E3.4050503@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:08:03 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/eventpoll: error handling micro-cleanup
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> While reviewing the 'may be used uninitialized' bogus gcc warnings,
>> I noticed that an error code assignment was only needed if an error had
>> actually occured.
>
> But that saved one line of code, and there are countless occurences in the
> kernel of such code pattern ;)
I'm not sure there are countless occurrences with PTR_ERR(). The line
is incorrect (but harmless) if inode is a valid pointer...
> In any case, fine by me and not worth further discussion.
Thanks :)
>> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
>> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
>> @@ -720,9 +720,10 @@ static int ep_getfd(int *efd, struct ino
>>
>> /* Allocates an inode from the eventpoll file system */
>> inode = ep_eventpoll_inode();
>> - error = PTR_ERR(inode);
>> - if (IS_ERR(inode))
>> + if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
>> + error = PTR_ERR(inode);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists