[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610010911231.21285@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/eventpoll: error handling micro-cleanup
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > While reviewing the 'may be used uninitialized' bogus gcc warnings,
> > > I noticed that an error code assignment was only needed if an error had
> > > actually occured.
> >
> > But that saved one line of code, and there are countless occurences in the
> > kernel of such code pattern ;)
>
> I'm not sure there are countless occurrences with PTR_ERR(). The line is
> incorrect (but harmless) if inode is a valid pointer...
I just tried a `find /usr/src/linux-2.6.16/ -type f -exec grep -H -C 2 PTR_ERR {} \;`
and looked at the cases where the error variable is assigned in any case
before the test. Same code pattern as, like:
error = -EFAULT;
if (copy_from_user(...))
goto kaboom;
Again, expect a big patch if you're gonna fix all those ;)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists