[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610021822.k92IMo44008167@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:22:50 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>,
Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:02:36 PDT, Linus Torvalds said:
> > MX checking is as broken or more broken than bayes.
>
> I have to say, OSDL has been doing MX checking, and it's effective as
> hell. Most importantly, when it _does_ break, it's not because some
> "content" is considered inappropriate, it's because some ISP does
> something technically wrong.
How did OSDL's MX checking deal with split in/out configurations like ours,
where our MX points at a load-balanced farm of Mirapoint front end appliances
with 1 IP address, but our main off-campus *outbound* comes from a different
address?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists