[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061002214012.GC9854@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:40:12 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
"Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:00:36PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Llu, 2006-10-02 am 13:40 -0400, ysgrifennodd Dave Jones:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > "or similar" maybe. The iRam is pretty much junk in my experience[*].
> > It rarely survives a mkfs, let alone sustained high throughput I/O.
> > (And yes, I did try multiple DIMMs, including ones which survive
> > memtest86 just fine).
>
> That appears to depend on the firmware and featureset used. With vaguely
> recent firmware apart from the "failed diagnostics at boot" bug the one
> I was loaned seems to be reliable and has fairly recent firmware.
Mine was latest hardware (rev 1.3), and there wasn't any firmware update
available that I could see. :-/
> > [*] And from googling/talking with other owners, my experiences aren't unique.
> Agreed - even in windows 8)
It's amazing crap like this reaches the store shelves.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists