linux-kernel - Re: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1159826436.8907.77.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:00:36 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	"Ananiev, Leonid I" <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Postal 56% waits for flock_lock_file_wait

Ar Llu, 2006-10-02 am 13:40 -0400, ysgrifennodd Dave Jones:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:51:56PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> "or similar" maybe. The iRam is pretty much junk in my experience[*].
> It rarely survives a mkfs, let alone sustained high throughput I/O.
> (And yes, I did try multiple DIMMs, including ones which survive
>  memtest86 just fine).

That appears to depend on the firmware and featureset used. With vaguely
recent firmware apart from the "failed diagnostics at boot" bug the one
I was loaned seems to be reliable and has fairly recent firmware.

> [*] And from googling/talking with other owners, my experiences aren't unique.

Agreed - even in windows 8)

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/