[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610030805490.3952@g5.osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
cc: akpm <akpm@...l.org>, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Math-emu kills the kernel on Athlon64 X2
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> OK, how about something more direct and less obtrusive, like this?
I think this is fine, but I also think it's a bit hacky.
Wouldn't it make more sense to make the whole "nofxsr" thing just clear
the capability, ie just a diff like the appended...
Does that work for you? If so, we should _also_ make sure that "no387"
calls this function too, so that you don't have to do _both_ no387 and
nofxsr, which is clearly silly. Once you do no387, the kernel should do
the nofxsr for you, methinks..
Linus
---
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 2799baa..7ac3c9e 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static void __cpuinit get_cpu_vendor(str
static int __init x86_fxsr_setup(char * s)
{
disable_x86_fxsr = 1;
+ clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_FXSR, boot_cpu_data.x86_capability);
return 1;
}
__setup("nofxsr", x86_fxsr_setup);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists